Islamic Bioethics, Porcine Therapeutics and Porcine Xenotransplantation: Islamic Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i2.1198Keywords:
Islamic Bioethics, porcine therapeutics, porcine xenotransplantation, Shari’ah, maqāṣid shari‘ahAbstract
Medical personnel (Healthcare Providers, HCPs) have the moral and ethical obligations of fulfilling the health needs of the patients and must be attentive to the patients’ cultural and religious needs. In Hong Kong, we have a small but significant Muslim population but very few Muslim HCPs. More often than not, we simply neglect or forget about the needs for our Muslim patients. The main cause is our lack of knowledge about Islamic Bioethics (IBE) especially on what treatments and procedures are permitted or prohibited. This article provides a detailed analysis to enable HCPs to understand and make decisions on permitted treatments for Muslim patients. This is extremely important for non-Muslim HCPs who have only mediocre or no knowledge in Islam. This study is a comprehensive review on the application of IBE, from their development since the contemporary period to Modern Times, the contributions of Islamic laws and the frames of belief in Sickness and Treatment. A special emphasis is provided for the mechanisms of relieves in reversing Prohibition. Pork is prohibited in Islam. The authors choose Porcine Therapeutics and Porcine Xenotransplantation (PXT) as the model to illustrate how Prohibition is determined in medical therapeutics and how the Prohibition can be reversed such that appropriate treatments can be offered and accepted. This model has the potential of application to all forms of therapeutics and may facilitate the interactions and decision making among HCPs and Muslim Patients. The principles of Shari’ah and maqāṣid shari‘ah, the basis of IBE in relation to sickness and treatment, and their applications to general biomedical issues, Porcine Therapeutics and PXT are explained in details. The prohibitions on the latter two areas can be reversed by invoking Transformation (istihalah), Dire Necessity (ḍarūrah), or Public Interest (maṣlahāh). The current permissibility in Xenotransplantation (XT) is considered to be premature and Dire Necessity (ḍarūrah) cannot be invoked because benefits from XT and PXT have not been established. Public Interest (maṣlahāh) can be invoked to allow for Experimental Research and Clinical Studies in PXT.
Downloads
References
Abdulrazeq, F., Al-Maamari, A., Ameen, W., & Ameen, A. (2019). Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Medical Residents towards Healthcare Ethics in the Islamic Hospital, Jordan. Yemeni Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(1), 1–9.
Ahmed, M., Kubilis, P., & Padela, A. (2018). American Muslim Physician Attitudes Toward Organ Donation. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1717–1730.
Akboğa, Ö. Ş., & Hobek, A. R. (2023). Acceptance of xenotransplantation by patients waiting for organ donation: A qualitative study. Xenotransplantation, 1–7.
Albar, M. A., & Chamsi-Pasha, H. (2015). Contemporary Bioethics Islamic Perspective. Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland.
Ali, A., Ahmed, T., Ayub, A., Dano, S., Khalid, M., El-Dassouki, N., Orchanian-Cheff, A., Alibhai, S., & Mucsi, I. (2020). Organ Donation and Transplant: The Islamic Perspective. Clinical Transplantation, 34(4), 1–12.
Ali, A., Kemter, E., & Wolf, E. (2024). Advances in Organ and Tissue Xenotransplantation. Annual Review Animal Biosciences, 12, 1–22.
Ali, M., Maravia, U., & Padela, A. I. (2023). Religious Viewpoints: Sunni Islam. In D. J. Hurst, L. Padilla, & W. D. Paris (Eds.), Xenotransplantation: Ethical, Regulatory, and Social Aspects (pp. 163–177). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Ali, O., Aljanadi, F., & Rabbi, H. (2022). The Use of Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves: an Islamic Perspective and a Bio-ethical Discussion. Journal of the British Islamic Medical Association, 11(4), 1–9.
Ali, S. N. S. binti M., & Gunardi, S. (2021). Porcine DNA in Medicine toward Postpartum Patients from Medical and Islamic Perspectives in Malaysia. International Journal of Halal Research, 3(1), 29–41.
Aramesh, K. (2023). Religious Viewpoints: Shia Islam. In D. J. Hurst, L. Padilla, & W. D. Paris (Eds.), Xenotransplantation: Ethical, Regulatory, and Social Aspects (pp. 179–186). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Aristizabal, A. M., Caicedo, L. A., Martínez, J. M., Moreno, M., & Echeverri, G. J. (2017). Clinical Xenotransplantation, a Closer Reality: Literature Review. Cirugía Española (English Edition), 95(2), 62–72.
Atighetchi, D. (2007). Islamic Bioethics: Problems and Perspectives. Springer, PO Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Azri, B., Mahyuddin, M., Luqman, A., Zaki, M. A., Dasuqkhi, M., & Solahuddin, M. (2017). Element of Swine from the Perspective of Fiqh Ruling and Fatwa in Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 25, 111–126.
Bokek-Cohen, Y., Gonen, L. D., & Tarabeih, M. (2023). The Muslim Patient and Medical Treatments based on Porcine Ingredients. BMC Medical Ethics, 24(89), 1–10.
Butt, M. Z. (2019). Organ Donation and Transplantation in Islam An Opinion.
Candlish, J. (2007). “Necessity” in Criminal and Medical Jurisprudence: A Comparison of Common Law and Islamic Law Concepts. IIUM Law Journal, 15(2), 215–229.
Carrier, A. N., Verma, A., Mohiuddin, M., Pascual, M., Muller, Y. D., Longchamp, A., Bhati, C., Buhler, L. H., Maluf, D. G., & Meier, R. P. H. (2022). Xenotransplantation: A New Era. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 1–11.
Chamsi-Pasha, H., & Albar, M. A. (2013). Western and Islamic Bioethics: How Close is the Gap? Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 3(1), 8–14.
Chamsi-Pasha, H., Albar, M. A., & Chamsi-Pasha, M. (2022). Comparative Study between Islamic and Western Bioethics: the Principle of Autonomy. Journal of the British Islamic Medical Association, 11(4), 1–12.
Coe, T. M., Markmann, J. F., & Rickert, C. G. (2020). Current Status of Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation. In Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation (Vol. 25, Issue 5, pp. 449–456). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Daar, A. S., & Al Khitamy, B. (2001). Bioethics for Clinicians: 21. Islamic Bioethics. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164(1), 60–63.
Dayan, F., & Ali, B. (2020). The Application of Necessity to Xeno-Transplantation: Constitutional & Islamic Bioethical Perspective. Llkogretim Online, 19(2), 1246–1253.
Denner, J. (2021). Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses and Xenotransplantation, 2021. Viruses, 13(11), 1–17.
Easterbrook, C., & Maddern, G. (2008). Porcine and Bovine Surgical Products Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu Perspectives. Arch Surg, 143(4), 366–370.
Ebrahim, A. F. M. (2008). An Introduction to Islamic Medical Jurisprudence. The Islamic Medical Association of South Africa, PO Box 701063, Overpot 4067, Durban, South Africa.
Ebrahim, A. F. M., & Padela, A. I. (2021). The Islamic Juridical Principle of Dire Necessity (al darura) and Its Application to the Field of Biomedical Intervention. In A. I. Padela (Ed.), Medicine and Shariah: A Dialogue in Islamic Bioethics (pp. 57–70). University of Note Dame Press.
El Fadl, K. A. (2017). Qur’anic Ethics and Islamic Law. J Islamic Ethics, 1, 7–28.
Founta, K. M., & Papanayotou, C. (2022). In Vivo Generation of Organs by Blastocyst Complementation: Advances and Challenges. International Journal of Stem Cells, 15(2), 113–121.
Fadel, H. E. (2022). Evolution of Islamic Medical Ethics - An Overview. Journal of the British Islamic Medical Association, 12(4), 4–10.
Freedman, B. S. (2018). Hopes and Difficulties for Blastocyst Complementation. Nephron, 138(1), 42–47.
Garry, D. J., Weiner, J. I., Greising, S. M., Garry, M. G., & Sachs, D. H. (2022). Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Clinical Impact of Science and Discovery. Circulation, 146(13), 961–963.
Griffith, B. P., Goerlich, C. E., Singh, A. K., Rothblatt, M., Lau, C. L., Shah, A., Lorber, M., Grazioli, A., Saharia, K. K., Hong, S. N., Joseph, S. M., Ayares, D., & Mohiuddin, M. M. (2022). Genetically Modified Porcine-to-Human Cardiac Xenotransplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(1), 35–44.
Ho, W. Y. (2013). Introduction: Hong Kong’s Tripartite Islamic Traditions. In Islam and China’s Hong Kong: Ethnic Identity, Muslim Networks and the New Silk Road (pp. 1–23). Routledge, London, United Kingdom.
Hussin, A. (2017). The Higher Objectives of Humanity (2nd ed.). LeadUS, https://leadusfikrah.wordpress.com/.
Isa, N. M. (2021). Human Germline Gene Editing from Maslahah Perspective: The Case of the World’s First Gene Edited Babies. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(2), 349–355.
Islam, T. (2021). Organ Donation in Islam: A Search for a Broader Quranic Perspective. Religions, 12(8), 1–8.
Ismail, S. A., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Shari’ah Concept of Medicine and Seeking Remedy. In M. M. Nordin (Ed.), FIMA Yearbook 2020 (pp. 31–35). Jordan Society for Islamic Medical Sciences, Amman, Jordan.
Kamali, M. H. (2021). The Principle of Original Permissibility (Ibahah). In M. H. Kamali (Ed.), Shariah and the Halal Industry (pp. 26–33). Oxford University Press, 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Khaleefah, S. (2022). Justice and Autonomy in Islamic Bioethics. Acta Cogitata, 10, 1–7.
Loike, J. D., & Kadish, A. (2018). Ethical Rejections of Xenotransplantation? EMBO Reports, 19(8), 1–4.
Montgomery, R. A., Stern, J. M., Lonze, B. E., Tatapudi, V. S., Mangiola, M., Wu, M., Weldon, E., Lawson, N., Deterville, C., Dieter, R. A., Sullivan, B., Boulton, G., Parent, B., Piper, G., Sommer, P., Cawthon, S., Duggan, E., Ayares, D., Dandro, A., Fazio-Kroll, A., Kokkinaki, M., Burdorf, L., Lorber, M., Boeke, J.D., Pass, H., Keating, B., Griesemer, A., Ali, N.M., Mehta, S.A., Stewart, Z. A. (2022). Results of Two Cases of Pig-to-Human Kidney Xenotransplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 386(20), 1889–1898.
Musa, H., & Nordin, M. M. (2022). The Permissibility of Judicially Prohibited and Impure Substances in Medicines from the Perspective of Contemporary Fiqh Councils. In M. M. Nordin (Ed.), FIMA Yearbook 2020 (pp. 36–39). Jordan Society for Islamic Medical Sciences, Amman, Jordan.
Niemann, H., & Petersen, B. (2016). The Production of Multi-transgenic Pigs: Update and Perspectives for Xenotransplantation. Transgenic Research, 25(3), 361–374.
Nordin, M. M., & Musa, H. (2015). The Permissibility of Judicially Prohibited and Impure Substances in Medicines. In D. D. M. M. Nordin, S. A. Ismail, & L. J. @Ahaddhaniah Chan (Eds.), Immunisation Controversies: What You Really Need to Know (2nd ed., pp. 113–116). Islamic Medical Association of Malaysia, Lot 27, Jalan Thavers, Kampung Oandan, 55100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Omar, N., & Muda, Z. (2017). The Application of the Rule of Istihsan bi Al-Maslahah (Juristic Preference by Interest): A Practical Approach on Some Medical Treatment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(5), 365–376.
Padela, A. I. (2022). Integrating Science and Scripture to Produce Moral Knowledge: Assessing Maṣlaḥa and Ḍarūra in Islamic Bioethics and the Case of Organ Donation. In A. al-Akiti & A. I. Padela (Eds.), Islam and Biomedicine (pp. 295–316). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Padela, A. I., Ali, M., & Yusuf, A. (2021). Aligning Medical and Muslim Morality: An Islamic Bioethical Approach to Applying and Rationing Life Sustaining Ventilators in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 1–36.
Padela, A. I., & Auda, J. (2020). The Moral Status of Organ Donation and Transplantation within Islamic Law: The Fiqh Council of North America’s Position. Transplantation Direct, 1–7.
Padela, A. I., Furber, S. W., Kholwadia, M. A., & Moosa, E. (2014). Dire Necessity and Transformation: Entry-points for Modern Science in Islamic Bioethical Assessment of Porcine Products in Vaccines. Bioethics, 28(2), 59–66.
Paris, W., Seidler, R. J. H., FitzGerald, K., Padela, A. I., Cozzi, E., & Cooper, D. K. C. (2018). Jewish, Christian and Muslim Theological Perspectives about Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation, 25(3), 1–8.
Pierson III, R. N., Fishman, J. A., Lewis, G. D., D’Alessandro, D. A., Connolly, M. R., Burdorf, L., Madsen, J. C., & Azimzadeh, A. M. (2020). Progress Toward Cardiac Xenotransplantation. Circulation, 142(14), 1389–1398.
Plöckinger, U., & Auga, U. (2022). The “Four Principles” of Western Medical Bioethics and the Bioethics of Shīʿī Islam in Iran—Is the Claim of Universality by Both Justified? Religions, 13(11), 1–26.
Porrett, P. M., Orandi, B. J., Kumar, V., Houp, J., Anderson, D., Cozette Killian, A., Hauptfeld-Dolejsek, V., Martin, D. E., Macedon, S., Budd, N., Stegner, K. L., Dandro, A., Kokkinaki, M., Kuravi, K. V., Reed, R. D., Fatima, H., Killian, J. T., Baker, G.,
Perry, J., Wright, E.D., Cheung, M.D., Erman, E.N., Kraebber, K., Gamblin, T., Guy, L., George, J.F., Ayares, D., Locke, J. E. (2022). First Clinical-grade Porcine Kidney Xenotransplant using a Human Decedent Model. American Journal of Transplantation, 22(4), 1037–1053.
Qotadah, H. A., & Syarifah, M. (2022). Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation as an Alternative Solution of Hifdz Al Nafs. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah, 12(2), 94–102.
Rasool, S., Hussain, M., Saleem, H. H., & Sultan, S. (2023). Islam and Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: from Theory to Practice. Russian Law Journal, 11(11s), 577–582.
Razak, A. L. A. (Ed.). (2017). Ethics & Fiqh for Everyday Life. IIIT, East and SEA, 2-93 Jalan Prima SG3, Prima Sri Gombak, 68300 Batu Caves, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia; Printer, One Global Publications Sdn Bhd, Malaysia.
Rosman, A. S., Khan, A., Fadzillah, N. A., Darawi, A. B. S., Hehsan, A., Hassan, A. M., Ghazali, M. A. ikhsan, & Haron, Z. (2020). Fatwa Debate on Porcine Derivatives in Vaccine from the Concept of Physical and Chemical Transformation (Istihalah) in Islamic Jurisprudence and Science. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 1037–1045.
Safian, Y. H. M. (2010). Necessity (darura) in Islamic Law: A Study with Special Reference to the Harm Reduction Programme in Malaysia [Ph D Thesis]. University of Exeter.
Samdani, M. J. (2019). Doctrine of Necessity (In Islamic Jurisprudence). Global Journal of Human Social Science: A Arts & Humanities - Psychology, 19(12), 53–58.
Sajoo, A. B. (2014). Negotiating Virtue: Principlism and Maslaha in Muslim Bioethics. Studies in Religion, 43(1), 53–69.
Shahab, M., Din, N. U., & Shahab, N. (2022). Genetically Engineered Porcine Organs for Human Xenotransplantation. Cureus, 14(9), 1–4.
Weber, A. S. (2023). Clinical Applications of the History of Medicine in Muslim-Majority Nations. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 78(1), 46–61.
Wong, K. L., & Faris, W. F. (2023). Necessity in Xenotransplantation: Islamic Perspectives Revisited. Al Shajarah, 28(2), 367–405.
Zailani, M. F. M., Hamdan, M. N., & Yusof, A. N. M. (2022). Human–Pig Chimeric Organ in Organ Transplantation from Islamic Bioethics Perspectives. Asian Bioethics Review, 1–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kee Lam Wong, Waleed Fekry Faris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.