Settlement of Abuse of Authority Relating to the Independence of the Curator Based on Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i4.1772Keywords:
Curator Independence, Bankruptcy, Abuse of AuthorityAbstract
The curator has the principle of independence and impartiality which is one of the main principles recognized and desired by Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The curator is responsible for errors or negligence in carrying out the duties of managing and settling the bankruptcy estate. Bankruptcy occurs due to bankruptcy experienced by a company. Bankruptcy is part of civil law. However, several bankruptcy cases eventually developed into crimes when the bankruptcy curator who was tasked with handling and administering bankruptcy cases abused his authority, especially in relation to independence. The complexity of resolving bankruptcy assets is further increased by the inclusion of a criminal sanctions article in the Bankruptcy Law which states that if it is proven that the curator is not independent, he can be subject to legal sanctions, both criminal and civil, in accordance with the law.
Downloads
References
BUKU-BUKU
Adrian Sutedi.2009. Hukum Kepailitan,Ghalia Indonesia.,Jakarta,2009.
Anton Suyatno, Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan, Kencana, Jakarta:2012.
Bernadette Waluyo, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, CV.Mandar Maju, Bancung, 1999.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, PenelitianHukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta:Kencana,2011
Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Perusahaan dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2006.
Serlika Aprita, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Pena Indis, Makasar,2017.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 277 K/Pid/2024
JURNAL DAN ARTIKEL
Dewi Tuti Muryati Dkk, Pengaturan Tanggung Jawab Curator Terhadap Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Kaitannya DenganHak Kreditor Sparatis, Jurnal Dinamika Social Budaya, Volume 19, Nomor 1, Universitas Semarang, Juni 2017
Firmansyah, , “Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit” Tesis FH UII, Yogyakarta, 2013.
Alusianto Hamonangan, dkk, “Peranan Kurator Terhadap Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas” Jurnal PKM Maju UDA, Vol. 2 No. 1, (2021).
Muryati, Dhian, Efy Yulisty, “Pengaturan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Kreditor Separatis”, Dinamika Sosial Budaya, Vol. 19 No. 1, (2017).
Ronald Saija,”Perspektif Sanksi Pidana Kurator Menurut Hukum Kepailitan” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia. Volume 1 Nomor 1, Maret 2021.
Rumelda, dan Onan, “Peran dan Wewenang Kurator dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas”, Medan: Retentum (2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yulia Putri Maulina, Teuku Syahrul Ansari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
