The Limits of the Relationship Between Ulama and Umara: An Analysis of the Book Ar-Risalah As-Sultaniyyah by Imam Jalaluddin As-Suyuti

Authors

  • Robi Putra Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hadis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung
  • Abdulloh Azam Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hadis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung
  • Muhammad Al Mighwar Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hadis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung
  • Dadah Dadah Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hadis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2947

Keywords:

Ulama and Umara, Ar-Risālah as-Sulṭāniyyah, Jalāluddīn al-Suyūṭī, Ethics of Power, Independence of Ulama

Abstract

The relationship between ulama and umara is a classic issue in Islamic civilization that has major implications for the moral and social stability of the community. Throughout history, the closeness or distance between these two entities often determines the religious direction and legitimacy of power. Imam Jalāluddīn as-Suyūṭī (d. 911 H) through his work Ar-Risālah as-Sulṭāniyyah emphasized the importance of maintaining ethical boundaries in the relationship between ulama and rulers, especially amidst political situations full of interests. This study aims to uncover the concept of the boundaries of the relationship between ulama and umara according to as-Suyūṭī and its relevance to the context of modern Islamic power. The method used is a library research study with a content analysis approach to the text of Ar-Risālah as-Sulṭāniyyah, complemented by a historical study of the context of Sultan Qāytbāy's reign during the Mamluk period. The results of the study show that as-Suyūṭī emphasized four main principles: maintaining the independence of ulama from political pressure, advising rulers with wisdom and courage, refusing gifts that could potentially tarnish integrity, and placing knowledge as a moral control over power. The conclusion of this study confirms that the ethical concept of the ulama-umara relationship according to as-Suyūṭī is still relevant in maintaining the balance between religious and political authority, and serves as an important guideline for the formation of the character of ulama with integrity in the contemporary era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islam dan ilmu pengetahuan: Integrasi epistemologi Islam dan humaniora. Yogyakarta: SUKA Press.

Ahmad, S. (2023). Etika hubungan ulama dan penguasa dalam perspektif Islam klasik. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Islam, 8(2), 45–59.

al-Ghazālī, A. H. (n.d.). Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm ad-Dīn (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah.

al-Sakhāwī, M. (1985). Al-Ḍawʾ al-Lāmiʿ li Ahl al-Qarn at-Tāsiʿ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

al-Sāwī, A. (2020). Al-Manhaj al-‘Ilmī ‘inda al-Suyūṭī. Kairo: Jāmi‘ah al-Azhar.

Al-Suyūṭī, J. (1994). Ar-Risālah as-Sulṭāniyyah. Kairo: Dār al-Manār.

Ayalon, D. (1994). Mamluk military society: A study of medieval Egypt. London: Variorum.

Ensiklopedia Islam. (n.d.). As-Suyuti. https://ensiklopediaislam.id/as-suyuti

Hallaq, W. B. (2010). An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press.

Hathaway, J. (2003). A tale of two fifteenth-century Egyptian historians. In The Mamluks in Egyptian politics and society (pp. 75–96). Leiden: Brill.

Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islamic Institutions and Democracy in Indonesia. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 19(4), 12–24.

Ibn al-Jawzī, A. F. (1983). Ṣayd al-Khāṭir. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ichwan, M. N. (2011). Official Ulama and the State: The Ulama Council of Indonesia in the Politics of Religious Authority. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 5(1), 37–66.

Kamali, M. H. (2018). The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam. Oxford University Press.

Kisah Imam Jalaluddin As-Suyuthi. (2020, Juli 19). Ar-Rasyiid. https://www.arrasyiid.my.id/2020/07/kisah-imam-jalaluddin-as-suyuthi.html

Levanoni, A. (1995). A turning point in Mamluk history: The third reign of al-Malik al-Nasir Muhammad ibn Qalawun. Leiden: Brill.

Mastori, M., Arifin, Z., & Iman, S. B. (2021). Historical review of ulama and umara’ relations and its implications for Islamic da’wah. Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies, 15(1), 103-126.

Masud, M. K. (2012). Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas. Harvard University Press.

Noorhaidi, H. (2018). Islam on the Move: The Tablighi Jama‘at in Southeast Asia. Leiden: Brill.

Nurhayati, S. (2020). Etika sosial ulama dan umara dalam pemikiran politik klasik Islam. Jurnal Tasamuh, 18(2), 233–250.

Rubaidi, R. (2025). Relasi kuasa ulama sufi dan negara dalam kultur-budaya politik Indonesia. Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian.

Sachedina, A. A. (2001). The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford University Press.

Saeed, A. (2014). Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First Century: A Contextualist Approach. Routledge.

Yamani, A. (2018). Al-nashīhah fī al-siyāsah al-shar‘iyyah: Dirāsah tahlīliyyah. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṣafwah.

Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

Robi Putra (2026) “The Limits of the Relationship Between Ulama and Umara: An Analysis of the Book Ar-Risalah As-Sultaniyyah by Imam Jalaluddin As-Suyuti”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 9(1), pp. 1892–1908. doi: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.2947.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.