The Role of Philosophy of Science in the Development of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1114Keywords:
Science Phylosophy, Development Of Science, Rationalism, EmpiricismAbstract
Philosophy of science is often considered a separate field and even irrelevant to the development of science. This assumption is a big mistake. This paper aims to reveal the role of philosophy of science in the three stages of scientific development (justification of initial concepts, integration of new theories, and criticism of scientific results) and to identify which philosophical approaches contribute most to the progress of science. Through a review of contemporary literature, it is found that the philosophy of science always provides an important rational basis for fundamental scientific conceptions, guides the direction of scientific development, bridges various scientific disciplines and approaches, and criticizes scientific theories and paradigms that are considered established. The rationalism and empiricism approaches have been identified as the most dominant and monumental in their role in shaping modern scientific methodology to date. Thus, the claim regarding the fundamental role of philosophy of science in the history and future of science has been proven comprehensively.
Downloads
References
Baehr, J. (2021). The problem of the growth of scientific knowledge. Synthese, 199(1-2), 1629–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03140-w
Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Gauche, R., Lima M. N., & Bruggeman, V. (2021). The rise of modern science and the forgotten role of philosophy: Implications on science teaching today. Science & Education, 30(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00258-x
Ibarra, A., & Mormann, T. (2021). Philosophy of science serves cognitive science: Explanatory depth and explanatory power with mechanistic focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.598407
Méthot, P. O. (2016). On the genealogy of concepts and experimental practices: Rethinking Georges Canguilhem’s historical epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 58, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.006
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sosa, R. D. (2021). Robert Kilwardby’s influence on Aristotle’s original philosophy. Philosophia, 49(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00171-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reza Aulia Setiawan, Sofyan Sauri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.