Forms of Implementation of the Philosophy of Science in the Development of Educational Science Theoretically and Practically

Authors

  • Annisa Maulida Ramadhani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Sofyan Sauri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1131

Keywords:

Implementation, Philosophy of Science, Education Science, Pedagogy

Abstract

This research aims to explain the implementation of the philosophy of science in the development of educational science, using literature review and qualitative descriptive methods in its presentation. The results obtained are: (1) Development of educational science which grows based on the scope of the philosophy of science, namely science (ontology), how the process of acquiring knowledge is (epistemology), and how the benefits of science are (axiology). (2) There are two approaches to the philosophy of science in educational research, namely the positivistic and non-postivistic approaches. The positivistic approach focuses on observation and experience as a form of searching for new truths, while the non-positivistic approach is a method that is not influenced by observation and experience, cannot be measured, and can be proven without observation. (3) Implementation of the philosophy of science in theoretical and practical aspects which are interrelated, theoretically producing a well-organized and systematic branch of science. Practically, it produces a humanistic and social spirit, namely a form of empathy with the hope that the knowledge taught can be useful in the realities of human life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asfar, A.M.I.T. (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amirfan-Asfar/publication/331224124_METODE_PENGEMBANGAN_KEILMUAN_PENDIDIKAN/links/5c6d20c892851c1c9deee2b5/METODE-PENGEMBANGAN-KEILMUAN-PENDIDIKAN.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 18 September 2023 Pukul 20.20 WIB.

Biyanto. 2013. Positivisme Dan Non-Positivisme Dalam Jurisprudensi. Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam. 3 (2). 484- 502. https://jurnalfuf.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/teosofi/article/view/39

Hanurawan, F., & Suhariadi, F. (2019). Filsafat Ilmu Psikologi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Komarudin, S. U. (2009). Landasan Pendidikan Konsep dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Muhith, A., dan Munawir. (2017). Pengembangan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Surabaya: Imtiyaz.

Nugroho, Irham. 2016. Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis Dan Nilai Etisnya Terhadap Sains. Jurnal Cakrawala. XI (2). 167-177. https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/cakrawala/article/view/192.

Rasdin, R dan Sauri, S. (2020). https://www.academia.edu/44478360/PENDEKATAN_POSITIVISTIK_DAN_NON_POSITIVISTIK_DALAM_PENELITIAN_PENDIDIKAN_Rafika_Rasdin_Sofyan_Sauri_. Diakses pada tanggal 19 September 2023 Pukul 21.35 WIB.

Santi, T., Nurwahidin, M., & Sudjarwo, S. (2022). Peran Filsafat Ilmu dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan di Era Modern. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(6), 2527-2540.

Sauri, S., Firmansyah, H., & Rizal, A.S. (2010). Filsafat Ilmu Pendidikan Agama. Bandung: Arfino Raya.

Soegiono. (2012). Filsafat Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. (1996). Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan

Widyawati, S. (2013). Filsafat Ilmu sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan. Gelar. 11 (1), 87-96. https://jurnal.isi-ska.ac.id/index.php/gelar/article/view/1441/1415

Downloads

Published

2025-01-05

How to Cite

Annisa Maulida Ramadhani and Sofyan Sauri (2025) “ Forms of Implementation of the Philosophy of Science in the Development of Educational Science Theoretically and Practically”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 7(4), pp. 1448–1458. doi: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1131.

Issue

Section

Articles